DEVELOPMENT OF LITERARY RESEARCH METHODS ADVANCING THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL INSIGHTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research examines the development of library research methods which aim to identify, analyze and synthesize information from various written sources, such as scientific journals, books and related documents. The research approach involves exploration of the literature through academic databases such as Google Scholar and Scopus, as well as thematic, chronological and methodological analysis to identify research patterns, trends and gaps. This method offers high flexibility in various fields of knowledge, both social, technological and scientific. Data analysis was carried out using a thematic approach to identify main themes, a chronological approach to understand research development, and a methodological approach to compare methods used in previous studies. As a result, this research succeeded in identifying patterns, trends and research gaps that can be used as a basis for further research. This study also illustrates the application of literature methods to the analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in higher education, demonstrating the benefits of AI in increasing the personalization of learning as well as teaching efficiency, despite the challenges of technology adoption.
Article Details
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Afiyanti, Y. (2005). Peinggunaan liteiratur dalam peineilitian kualitatif. Jurnal Keipeirawatan Indoneisia, 9(1).
Ardianto. (2010). Meitodei Peineilitian Untuk Public Reialtion Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Simbiosa Reikatama.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Taking a systeimatic approach to your liteiraturei reivieiw. In Systeimatic approacheis to a succeissful liteiraturei reivieiw (Vol. 2n).
Bossuyt, P., Louis, Ei., Mary, J. Y., Veirmeiirei, S., & Bouhnik, Y. (2018). Deifining eindoscopic reimission in ileiocolonic Crohn’s diseiasei: Leit’s start from scratch. In Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis (Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.1093/eicco-jcc/jjy097
Casteitteir, W. B. (1988). Deiveiloping and deifeinding a disseirtation proposal. Graduatei School of Eiducation, Univeirsity of Peinnsylvania.
Costigliola, F. C. (2019). Library of Congreiss Cataloging in Publication Data. Awkward Dominion, 381–382. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501721144-016
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukheirjeiei, D., Pandeiy, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliomeitric analysis: An oveirvieiw and guideilineis. Journal of Busineiss Reiseiarch, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusreis.2021.04.070
Guba, Ei., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Eiffeictivei eivaluation (Vol. 1).
Leieidy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. Ei. (2021). Practical reiseiarch: Planning and Deisign (Tweilfth Eidition).
Prastowo, A. (2012). Meitodei peineilitian kualitatif dalam peirspeiktif rancangan peineilitian.
Putri, B. D. D. (2021). DAFTAR PUSTAKA Abdul Mustaqim. Akhlak Tasawuf.(yogyakarta. Kaukaba Dipantara 2013) Abu Ahmadi Dkk. Ilmu Peindidkan (Jakarta. PT RINEiKA CIPTA, 2015) Ahmad Tafsir. Ilmu peindidikan dalam peirspeiktif islam.(Bandung PT Reimaja Rosdakarya1992) Binti Maunah. ilmu p. UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Beingkulu.
Sabarguna, B. S. (2005). Analisis data pada peineilitian kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Preiss.
Sarwono, J. (2006). Meitodei peineilitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif.
Siddiq, A. M. (2020). Kajian Pustaka dalam Artikeil Jurnal. Hasil Laporan Peineilitian,(Bandung: Univeirsitas Peindidikan, 2020) Hlm, 6.
Siyoto, S., & Soduk, M. A. (2015). Dasar Meitodologi Peineilitian.
Stadtländeir, C. T. K.-H. (2009). Qualitativei, Quantitativei, and Mixeid-Meithods Reiseiarch. Microbei Magazinei, 4(11), 485–485. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbei.4.485.1
Sugiyono. (2020). Meitodologi Peineilitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.
Sutikno, S. P. M. P. P. D. C. I. Q. R. (n.d.). STRATEiGI DAN TEiKNIK PEiNEiLITIAN (Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif). GUEiPEiDIA. Reitrieiveid from https://books.googlei.co.id/books?id=yodlEiAAAQBAJ
Yusuf, S. A., & Khasanah, U. (2019). Kajian liteiratur dan teiori sosial dalam peineilitian. Meitodei Peineilitian Eikonomi Syariah, 80, 1–23.
Zeid, M. (2008). Meitodei peineilitian keipustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indoneisia.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research examines the development of library research methods which aim to identify, analyze and synthesize information from various written sources, such as scientific journals, books and related documents. The research approach involves exploration of the literature through academic databases such as Google Scholar and Scopus, as well as thematic, chronological and methodological analysis to identify research patterns, trends and gaps. This method offers high flexibility in various fields of knowledge, both social, technological and scientific. Data analysis was carried out using a thematic approach to identify main themes, a chronological approach to understand research development, and a methodological approach to compare methods used in previous studies. As a result, this research succeeded in identifying patterns, trends and research gaps that can be used as a basis for further research. This study also illustrates the application of literature methods to the analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in higher education, demonstrating the benefits of AI in increasing the personalization of learning as well as teaching efficiency, despite the challenges of technology adoption.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Afiyanti, Y. (2005). Peinggunaan liteiratur dalam peineilitian kualitatif. Jurnal Keipeirawatan Indoneisia, 9(1).
Ardianto. (2010). Meitodei Peineilitian Untuk Public Reialtion Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Simbiosa Reikatama.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Taking a systeimatic approach to your liteiraturei reivieiw. In Systeimatic approacheis to a succeissful liteiraturei reivieiw (Vol. 2n).
Bossuyt, P., Louis, Ei., Mary, J. Y., Veirmeiirei, S., & Bouhnik, Y. (2018). Deifining eindoscopic reimission in ileiocolonic Crohn’s diseiasei: Leit’s start from scratch. In Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis (Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.1093/eicco-jcc/jjy097
Casteitteir, W. B. (1988). Deiveiloping and deifeinding a disseirtation proposal. Graduatei School of Eiducation, Univeirsity of Peinnsylvania.
Costigliola, F. C. (2019). Library of Congreiss Cataloging in Publication Data. Awkward Dominion, 381–382. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501721144-016
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukheirjeiei, D., Pandeiy, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliomeitric analysis: An oveirvieiw and guideilineis. Journal of Busineiss Reiseiarch, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusreis.2021.04.070
Guba, Ei., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Eiffeictivei eivaluation (Vol. 1).
Leieidy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. Ei. (2021). Practical reiseiarch: Planning and Deisign (Tweilfth Eidition).
Prastowo, A. (2012). Meitodei peineilitian kualitatif dalam peirspeiktif rancangan peineilitian.
Putri, B. D. D. (2021). DAFTAR PUSTAKA Abdul Mustaqim. Akhlak Tasawuf.(yogyakarta. Kaukaba Dipantara 2013) Abu Ahmadi Dkk. Ilmu Peindidkan (Jakarta. PT RINEiKA CIPTA, 2015) Ahmad Tafsir. Ilmu peindidikan dalam peirspeiktif islam.(Bandung PT Reimaja Rosdakarya1992) Binti Maunah. ilmu p. UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Beingkulu.
Sabarguna, B. S. (2005). Analisis data pada peineilitian kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Preiss.
Sarwono, J. (2006). Meitodei peineilitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif.
Siddiq, A. M. (2020). Kajian Pustaka dalam Artikeil Jurnal. Hasil Laporan Peineilitian,(Bandung: Univeirsitas Peindidikan, 2020) Hlm, 6.
Siyoto, S., & Soduk, M. A. (2015). Dasar Meitodologi Peineilitian.
Stadtländeir, C. T. K.-H. (2009). Qualitativei, Quantitativei, and Mixeid-Meithods Reiseiarch. Microbei Magazinei, 4(11), 485–485. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbei.4.485.1
Sugiyono. (2020). Meitodologi Peineilitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.
Sutikno, S. P. M. P. P. D. C. I. Q. R. (n.d.). STRATEiGI DAN TEiKNIK PEiNEiLITIAN (Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif). GUEiPEiDIA. Reitrieiveid from https://books.googlei.co.id/books?id=yodlEiAAAQBAJ
Yusuf, S. A., & Khasanah, U. (2019). Kajian liteiratur dan teiori sosial dalam peineilitian. Meitodei Peineilitian Eikonomi Syariah, 80, 1–23.
Zeid, M. (2008). Meitodei peineilitian keipustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indoneisia.