PERBANDINGAN SISTEM ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK ANTARA INDONESIA DAN JEPANG DALAM MENGHADAPI BIROKRASI MODERN
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of modern bureaucracy reflects the need for an adaptive,afficient,and accountable public administration system in responding to global dynamics, tecnological advancement,and increasing public demands for high-quality public service. This article aims to compare the public administration systems of Indonesia and Japan in addressing the challeges of modern bureaucracy. The study employs a deskriptive approach using a comprative method, based on the analysis of policy documents,goverment performance repots,and relevant literature on public administration reform in both countries. The findings indicate that japan possesses a relatively stable public administration system characterized by a professional bureaucracy,strong inter-agency coordination, and a work culture that emphasizes discipline and policy continuity. Meanwhile, Indonesia continues to face various challenges in bureaucratic modernization,including regulatory complexity, institutional fragmentation,and iconsistecies in the implementation of bureaucratic reforms, despite notable progress through the adoption of performance manajement and the digitalization of public services. This study concludes that differences in instutional context, bureaucratic culture, and public administration capacity significantly influence the ability of both countries to manage modern bureaucratly. The findings are expected to contribute theoritically to the field of comprative public administration and serve as a practical reference for the formulation of bureacratic reform policies in Indonesia.
Article Details
Section
Articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Rodi Wahyudi. 2020. “Maladministrasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Sejarah.” Jurnal Niara 13(1): 145–54. doi:10.31849/niara.v13i1.3295.
Sakir, Ahmad Rosandi. 2024. “Transformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia: Kajian Dari Sudut Pandang Administrasi Publik.” Gema Publica 9(2): 132–43. doi:10.14710/gp.9.2.2024.50-61.
Seno, Ramadhani Haryo. 2020. “Strategi Jepang Dalam Mereformasi Administrasi : Literature Review.” Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara 8(2): 205–23. doi:10.30656/sawala.v8i2.2564.
Suryani, Eny, and Shintya Awalin Diniawaty. 2024. “Penyederhanaan Birokrasi : Wujud Nyata Langkah Pemerintah Indonesia Menuju Agile Governance.” Jurnal Publik 18(01): 11–25. doi:10.52434/jp.v18i01.325.
Winengan, Winengan. 2018. “Menakar Penerapan New Public Management Dalam Birokrasi Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik 4(1): 66–74. doi:10.21776/ub.jiap.2019.004.01.10.
Yusriadi, Yusriadi. 2018. “Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia: Peluang Dan Hambatan.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal 8(2): 178. doi:10.31289/jap.v8i2.1824.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of modern bureaucracy reflects the need for an adaptive,afficient,and accountable public administration system in responding to global dynamics, tecnological advancement,and increasing public demands for high-quality public service. This article aims to compare the public administration systems of Indonesia and Japan in addressing the challeges of modern bureaucracy. The study employs a deskriptive approach using a comprative method, based on the analysis of policy documents,goverment performance repots,and relevant literature on public administration reform in both countries. The findings indicate that japan possesses a relatively stable public administration system characterized by a professional bureaucracy,strong inter-agency coordination, and a work culture that emphasizes discipline and policy continuity. Meanwhile, Indonesia continues to face various challenges in bureaucratic modernization,including regulatory complexity, institutional fragmentation,and iconsistecies in the implementation of bureaucratic reforms, despite notable progress through the adoption of performance manajement and the digitalization of public services. This study concludes that differences in instutional context, bureaucratic culture, and public administration capacity significantly influence the ability of both countries to manage modern bureaucratly. The findings are expected to contribute theoritically to the field of comprative public administration and serve as a practical reference for the formulation of bureacratic reform policies in Indonesia.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Rodi Wahyudi. 2020. “Maladministrasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Sejarah.” Jurnal Niara 13(1): 145–54. doi:10.31849/niara.v13i1.3295.
Sakir, Ahmad Rosandi. 2024. “Transformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia: Kajian Dari Sudut Pandang Administrasi Publik.” Gema Publica 9(2): 132–43. doi:10.14710/gp.9.2.2024.50-61.
Seno, Ramadhani Haryo. 2020. “Strategi Jepang Dalam Mereformasi Administrasi : Literature Review.” Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara 8(2): 205–23. doi:10.30656/sawala.v8i2.2564.
Suryani, Eny, and Shintya Awalin Diniawaty. 2024. “Penyederhanaan Birokrasi : Wujud Nyata Langkah Pemerintah Indonesia Menuju Agile Governance.” Jurnal Publik 18(01): 11–25. doi:10.52434/jp.v18i01.325.
Winengan, Winengan. 2018. “Menakar Penerapan New Public Management Dalam Birokrasi Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik 4(1): 66–74. doi:10.21776/ub.jiap.2019.004.01.10.
Yusriadi, Yusriadi. 2018. “Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia: Peluang Dan Hambatan.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal 8(2): 178. doi:10.31289/jap.v8i2.1824.