Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): June
Articles

COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR STAKEHOLDER COORDINATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN INDONESIA

Luluk Nafisah
Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan
Aminullah
Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan

Published 2026-06-11

Keywords

  • collaborative governance; stakeholder coordination; accountability; public administration; Indonesia.

Abstract

Collaborative governance has emerged as an important approach for addressing complex public policy issues that involve multiple stakeholders with diverse interests, resources, and authority. However, coordination difficulties and accountability gaps often hinder the effectiveness of collaborative arrangements. This study aims to develop a collaborative governance framework that strengthens stakeholder coordination and accountability in the Indonesian policy context. Using a conceptual research design based on literature synthesis, the study analyzes key dimensions of collaborative governance and integrates them into a structured analytical framework. The findings indicate that effective collaborative governance depends on five interrelated elements: clarity of mandate, inclusive and legitimate stakeholder participation, structured role allocation, transparent decision-making procedures, and an operational monitoring–evaluation–learning system. The framework demonstrates that clear responsibilities, transparent processes, and accountability mechanisms can reduce coordination failures, prevent responsibility diffusion, and improve policy implementation outcomes. Furthermore, continuous monitoring and learning enable collaborative arrangements to adapt to changing institutional and policy environments. The proposed framework contributes both theoretically and practically by providing an analytical lens for future empirical studies and practical guidance for designing and implementing collaborative governance initiatives in Indonesia.

References

  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  2. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
  3. Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
  4. Cristofoli, D., Douglas, S., Torfing, J., & Trivellato, B. (2022). Having it all: Can collaborative governance be both legitimate and accountable? Public Management Review, 24(5), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1960736
  5. O'Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (2009). The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century. Georgetown University Press.
  6. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
  7. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation & Governance, 4(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01076.x
  8. Voets, J., Verhoest, K., & Meyers, R. (2022). Accountability in collaborative governance: Mechanisms and challenges. Public Management Review, 24(6), 845–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1916064
  9. Willems, T., & Van Dooren, W. (2011). Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(3), 505–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311408648
  10. Torfing, J. (2021). Accountable government through collaborative governance? Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040127
  11. Voets, J., Van Dooren, W., & De Rynck, F. (2008). A framework for assessing the performance of policy networks. Public Management Review, 10(6), 773–790.
  12. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press.
  13. Kim, S., & Siddiki, S. (2018). Diversity and procedural justice in collaborative governance. Policy Studies Journal, 46(4), 894–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12199
  14. OECD. (2020). Policy framework on sound public governance: Baseline features of governments that work well. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c03e01b3-en
  15. Mohamed, A. A., & Kulmie, A. M. (2023). Role of effective monitoring and evaluation in promoting good governance in public institutions. Public Administration Research, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/par.v12n2p1
  16. Leach, W. D., Weible, C. M., Vince, S. R., Siddiki, S. N., & Calanni, J. C. (2015). Fostering learning through collaboration: Knowledge acquisition and belief change in marine aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut011
  17. Yusri, A., Fadli, M., et al. (2024). Collaborative governance strategy in increasing production and strengthening food diversification in Rokan Hulu Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 11, 287–300.
  18. Rudiadi, et al. (2023). Collaborative governance in a mandated setting: Shifting collaboration in stunting interventions at local level. Development Policy Review, 41(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2023.2212868