Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): June
Articles

COORDINATION MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE PROTOCOL DIVISION AND REGIONAL GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REGIONAL HEAD'S OFFICIAL AGENDA IN CENTRAL LAMPUNG REGENCY

PDF
  • M. Zuliyan Wahyu Dinata,
  • Agus Purnomo
M. Zuliyan Wahyu Dinata
Universitas Bandar Lampung
Agus Purnomo
Universitas Bandar Lampung

Published 2026-06-30

Keywords

  • Coordination, Protocol Section, OPD, Official Agenda, Regional Government.

Abstract

     


 Effective coordination between the Protocol Division and Regional Government Organizations (OPDs) is essential for ensuring the successful implementation of official governmental agendas and maintaining the quality of public administration. However, the increasing complexity of governmental activities often creates coordination challenges related to communication, task synchronization, and institutional collaboration. This study aims to analyze the coordination management between the Protocol Division and OPDs in implementing the official agendas of the Regional Head in Central Lampung Regency. A qualitative approach with a case study design was employed to obtain an in-depth understanding of coordination practices within the local government. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, direct observations, and document analysis involving protocol officers and representatives from relevant OPDs. The data were analyzed using the interactive model of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, while data credibility was ensured through source, method, and time triangulation, as well as member checking. The findings reveal that coordination management is implemented through four interconnected stages, namely planning, implementation, supervision, and evaluation. The Protocol Division serves as the central coordinating unit responsible for integrating the roles and responsibilities of multiple OPDs to ensure the orderly execution of official governmental activities. Effective coordination is supported by leadership commitment, competent human resources, intensive inter-agency communication, and collaborative working relationships. Nevertheless, coordination remains constrained by sudden schedule changes, limited human resources, inconsistent understanding of protocol procedures, and insufficient documentation of evaluation results. This study concludes that strengthening institutional coordination mechanisms, standardizing operational procedures, enhancing staff capacity, and optimizing digital communication systems are essential for improving the effectiveness, responsiveness, and sustainability of protocol management within local government.

PDF

References

  1. Adhitama, M. S. (2021). Koordinasi antar bidang dan kerjasama Badan Kepegawaian Daerah dengan organisasi perangkat daerah lainnya di lingkungan Pemerintah Kabupaten Probolinggo dalam pemutakhiran data Sistem Informasi Administrasi Pegawai (SIAP Online). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2021.007.01.8
  2. Ahad, M. P. Y., & Barsei, A. N. (2023). Collaborative governance sistem pemerintahan berbasis elektronik: Best practice dari pemerintah daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 13(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.56196/jta.v13i01.236
  3. Apriyanto, R. A., & Supriyono, M. R. (2023). Penerapan peraturan daerah tentang pelayanan publik bagian protokol komunikasi dan administrasi pimpinan: Studi penelitian di Pemerintahan Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(7), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.53625/jpdsh.v2i7.5702
  4. Bachtiar, B. (2021). Fungsi koordinasi Bappeda dalam menunjang pelaksanaan otonomi daerah di Kabupaten Halmahera Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasita’, 12(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.47030/administrasita.v12i1.38
  5. Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2020). Public service management and co-production in local government. Public Money & Management, 40(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1729063
  6. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). Administrative coordination capacity: Theoretical foundations and empirical findings. Public Organization Review, 20(4), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00478-7
  7. Davoudi, S., & Johnson, M. (2022). Preconditions of coordination in regional public organizations. Public Management Review, 26(4), 988–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2134915
  8. Diputra, A. G., Jatmikowati, S. H., & Wiyani, W. (2024). Implementation of the protocoler’s role on facilitating the agenda of the regional head. DiA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 22(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v22i2.10031
  9. Efendi, T., Frinaldi, A., Magriasti, L., & Naldi, H. (2023). Reforming local government roles and apparatus structure in Indonesia. Journal of English Language and Education, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.34010/jele.v8i1.1008
  10. Frykmer, T., & Becker, P. (2024). Emergence and institutionalization of interorganizational coordination structures in crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12510
  11. Handayani, D., & Wibowo, S. (2022). Peran protokol dalam meningkatkan citra dan tata kelola pemerintahan daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Nusantara, 3(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.33369/japn.v3i1.20123
  12. Hermawan, D. (2024). Manajemen komunikasi protokoler dalam implementasi acara resmi pemerintah kabupaten. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 9(1), 88–101.
  13. Hidayat, A., & Putri, K. (2024). Pelayanan protokoler dan hubungan masyarakat dalam membangun citra pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Komunikasi Pemerintahan, 6(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.25090/jkp.v6i1.6789
  14. Kårtvedt, L. E. (2024). Explaining coordination quality in public service delivery. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(4), 849–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2315016
  15. Kim, S. (2021). Leadership roles in local government protocol and event management. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(12), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1782325
  16. Lestari, D. A., & Wicaksono, B. A. (2023). Efektivitas komunikasi birokrasi dalam mendukung koordinasi lintas sektor pemerintahan daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Nusantara, 4(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.55678/jan.v4i2.8921
  17. Lismawati, S., Mulyadi, A., & Meigawati, D. (2023). Koordinasi fungsional antar instansi dalam mewujudkan Kota Layak Anak di Kota Sukabumi. Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v8i3.4718
  18. Mahyuddin, Y., & Fadillah, R. (2025). Penguatan fungsi protokoler dalam pemerintahan modern. Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.25090/jmp.v11i1.9021
  19. Muharsono, M., Pramono, T., & Nurhalimah, Z. (2023). Coordination effectiveness in the implementation of public services: Case study in Sumbergempol District, Tulungagung Regency. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 7(1), 456–581. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v7i1.45681
  20. Nabatchi, T., & Emerson, K. (2020). Collaborative governance in public institutions. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(6), 1315–1339. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1780933
  21. Nurjayanti, N., Hatta, H., & Numberi, L. (2024). Analisis peran Biro Humas dan Protokol Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Papua dalam aktivitas media relations. Jambura: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(2), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.37905/jik.v1i2.68
  22. Purwati, U. W., & Agustina, I. F. (2025). Regional protocol roles in local government social conduct management. Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review, 26(4), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijppr.v26i4.1463
  23. Putra, R., & Wulandari, S. (2022). Peran Bagian Protokol dalam sinkronisasi kegiatan kepala daerah pasca-pandemi. Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 7(1), 45–59.
  24. Rahmadani, A. (2021). Efektivitas koordinasi lintas OPD dalam pelaksanaan agenda pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(2), 112–124.
  25. Rahmawati, F., & Subekti, T. (2023). Koordinasi antarbagian dalam mendukung layanan pimpinan pemerintahan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Indonesia, 9(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.52423/japi.v9i1.842
  26. Rakhmawati, N., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Profesionalisme aparatur dalam pelayanan protokoler pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 10(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.23960/jian.v10i2.265
  27. Savitri, N. (2023). Analisis kolaborasi antar-instansi pada acara pemerintahan berbasis multi-OPD. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 12(3), 201–214.
  28. Shankar, S., & Narang, R. (2020). Government Event Administration: Protocol Management in Public Sector Ceremonies. Journal of Public Affairs Management, 18(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.2145
  29. Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., & Howlett, M. (2023). Public sector coordination and collaborative governance. Policy and Society, 42(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad001
  30. Sutanto, R., & Pratama, I. (2023). Manajemen acara resmi pemerintah dan fungsi keprotokolan. Jurnal Pemerintahan Daerah, 7(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.54321/jpd.v7i2.455
  31. Syarien, M. I. A., & Samarah, G. (2023). Interagency coordination drivers, instruments, and success factors: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i3.1296
  32. Wulansari, E., & Akhmad, J. (2023). Analisis efektivitas pola komunikasi bagian protokol dalam mendukung tugas pimpinan daerah di Pemerintah Kabupaten Temanggung. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa, 1(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.32477/jurima.v1i1.757
  33. Yuliani, L., & Mahfud, I. (2021). Koordinasi antar-OPD dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pelayanan publik. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik, 25(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.65218.