NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEGAL CERTAINTY FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE AS ALTERNATIVE PUNISHMENT UNDER THE NEW CRIMINAL CODE
Published 2026-08-10
Keywords
- Legal Certainty, Community Service, Criminal Code.
Abstract
The revision of Indonesian criminal law through Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code (New Criminal Code) introduces community service as an alternative punishment intended to reduce reliance on imprisonment and promote offender rehabilitation. However, its effectiveness depends on the legal certainty provided by the applicable regulatory framework. This study analyzes the legal certainty of community service as an alternative punishment under the New Criminal Code and examines its implications for penal reform in Indonesia. Using normative legal research, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were analyzed qualitatively through systematic legal interpretation and legal argumentation. The findings indicate that the New Criminal Code provides a legal basis for the imposition, duration, and general implementation of community service. Nevertheless, legal certainty remains incomplete due to regulatory gaps concerning judicial discretion, implementation standards, institutional coordination, and oversight mechanisms, which may lead to inconsistent judicial practices. The study concludes that legal certainty depends not only on the existence of legal norms but also on a coherent regulatory framework that ensures clarity, consistency, and predictability. Strengthening implementing regulations, practical guidelines, and institutional capacity is therefore essential to ensure the effective implementation of community service and support Indonesia’s criminal justice reform.
References
- Abdullah, A. D., Faturrahman, M. Z., & Hosnah, A. U. (2025). Efektivitas Pemidanaan Non-Penjara dalam Mengurangi Overcrowding Lapas di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Legalita, 7(2), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v7i2.2051
- Abdullah, O. S., Rahmawati, M., & Ilwafa, R. (2024). Orientasi Implementasi Pidana Kerja Sosial sebagai Alternatif Pidana Non-Pemenjaraan dalam KUHP 2023.
- Ahimsya, M. G. R. S. (2026). Efektivitas Pidana Kerja Sosial dan Pidana Pengawasan Sebagai Alternatif Penjara Jangka Pendek dalam Kuhp Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Inklusi Indonesia, 1(1). https://jurnal.inklusipemudaindonesia.com/jhii/article/view/17
- Al Idrus, N. F. (2023). DISPARITAS PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA PENIPUAN ONLINE | Jurnal Yudisial. https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/jy/id/article/view/598
- Amalia, M., Rasiwan, I., Rosita, D., Minabari, A., Wibowo, K. T., Khumaeroh, I. N., R, R., Juita, S. R., & Putrazta, S. A. (2025). Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dalam Perspektif KUHP Baru. AMU Press, 1–213.
- Barda Nawawi Arief. (2016). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Prenada Media.
- Duff, R. A. (2018). The Realm of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
- Falah, T. A. A. (2025). Analisis Pidana Kerja Sosial Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Jangka Pendek: Perspektif KUHP Baru Indonesia. Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i1.457
- Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Fuller, L. L. (1969). The Morality of Law. Yale University Press.
- Ginting, J. (2020). SANKSI KERJA SOSIAL SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF BENTUK PEMIDANAAN DALAM SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Law Review, 19(3), 246. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v19i3.2098
- Gultom, P. (2022). Analisis Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Kemungkinan Dapat Diterapkannya Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia (Sociological Analysis of Law on the Possibility of Implementing Restorative Justice in Corruption Crime Cases in Indonesia) (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4065348). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4065348
- Herlina, M. (2024). KONSEP PENYUSUNAN NORMA PENJELASAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN GUNA MENCEGAH MULTITAFSIR DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA | Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung. https://jurnal.sthg.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/35
- Hirsch. (1996). Censure and Sanctions. Oxford University Press.
- ILO Convention No. 29. (1930). Convention C029—Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29).https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C029
- Irvany, R. J. R. (2026). KONSEP PIDANA KERJA SOSIAL SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PEMIDANAAN BERBASIS KEMANFAATAN SOSIAL. Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Perspectives, 2(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.70837/hmw2jz80
- Jamilah, A., & Disemadi, H. S. (2020). Pidana Kerja Sosial: Kebijakan Penanggulangan Overcrowding Penjara. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 8(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i1.726
- Listiyanto, A., Panggabean, M. L., & Siregar, R. A. (2025). Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam KUHP Baru: Tantangan dan Harapan Perwujudan Keadilan Restoratif di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 11(1), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v11i1.5461
- Manuputty, G. I., Supusepa, R., & Taufik, I. (2026). Disparitas Pemidanaan Pada Ratio Decidendi Perkara Narkotika dalam Kajian Individualisasi Pidana. Journal of Business, Social and Technology, 7(2), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i2.615
- Marzuki, P. D. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
- Mertokusumo, P. D. S. (2019). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. cvmaha karya pustaka.
- Nainggolan, R. H. (2025). Pidana Kerja Sosial Salah Satu Alternatif Mengurangi Kelebihan Kapasitas Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Gevangenen : Jurnal Kajian Lembaga Pemasyarakatan, 1(1), 41–70.
- Pebriyanti, S. D. A., & Arini, D. R. (2025). PROGRAM REHABILITASI DAN PENGURANGAN RESIDIVISME: TINJAUAN ATAS KINERJA LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN.
- Putra, R. W. S., Prakoso, A. P., Wulandari, C., & Pelupessy, I. H. (2025). Pidana Pokok Kerja Sosial Dalam Perspektif KUHP Baru Indonesia Wujudkan Pendekatan Keadilan Rehabilitatif. QISTIE, 18(2), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v18i2.12802
- Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041
- Rayfindratama, A. D. (2023). KEBEBASAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN. Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, 1(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i2.409
- Saputra, S. N. E., & Isnawati, M. (2022). Overcrowding Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) Dalam System Pemidanaan Di Indonesia. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 6(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v0i0.3822
- Sugiharto, G. (2016). Relevansi Kebijakan Penetapan Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v7i3.a3936
- Syam, E. S., Wahyuni, E. N., Burhan, P. A., & Muliyadi, M. (2025). DISFUNGSI PENGAWASAN DALAM EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PIDANA DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEPASTIAN HUKUM. DEDIKASI : Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial, Hukum, Budaya, 26(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.31293/ddk.v26i2.9212
- Tyas, A. A., & Iskandar, I. S. (2025). Kesiapan Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Dalam Pelaksanaan Pidana Kerja Sosial: (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Wilayah Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 4(6), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v4i6.571
- Ulfah, M. (2021). Pidana Kerja Sosial, Tokyo Rules, serta Tantangannya di Masa Mendatang. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 10(3), 517. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p07
- United Nations. (1990). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules). OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-standard-minimum-rules-non-custodial-measures
- UU No. 1 Tahun 2023. Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK. Retrieved July 6, 2026, from http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/234935/uu-no-1-tahun-2023
- Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 165