STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING PUBLIC SERVICE PERFORMANCE AT THE NORTH SUNGKAI SUBDISTRICT OFFICE, NORTH LAMPUNG REGENCY
Published 2026-08-07
Keywords
- public service performance; personnel competence; information technology; leadership; SWOT analysis
Abstract
This study examines public service performance, identifies the internal and external factors that influence it, and formulates improvement strategies at the North Sungkai Subdistrict Office, North Lampung Regency. A qualitative descriptive approach supported by quantitative data was employed. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, documentation, and questionnaires. Seven informants were selected purposively, while all 23 personnel, comprising 17 civil servants and 6 government employees under work agreements, were included through a census. The data were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña model, descriptive analysis, and a SWOT matrix. The findings indicate that productivity, service quality, responsibility, and accountability were good, whereas responsiveness was fairly good and still required faster service delivery and stronger coordination. Organizational strengths included personnel experience, commitment to service, coordination, leadership support, and a clear division of duties. Weaknesses included limited staffing, facilities, training opportunities, and technology utilization. Priority strategies include competency development, service digitalization, facility improvement, strengthening a culture of service excellence, transparency, accountability, continuous service innovation, and periodic performance evaluation, supported consistently and sustainably by the local government.
References
- Cahyarini, F. D. (2021). Implementasi digital leadership dalam pengembangan kompetensi digital pada pelayanan publik [Implementation of digital leadership in developing digital competence in public services]. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2021.3780
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Dwiyanto, A. (2005). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik [Realizing good governance through public services]. Gadjah Mada University Press.
- Harlan, L. A., Darma, & Murniati. (2021). Kinerja aparatur kelurahan dalam pelayanan publik berbasis aplikasi LAIKA [Performance of urban-village personnel in LAIKA application-based public services]. Parabela: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan & Politik Lokal, 1(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.51454/parabela.v1i2.376
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Natsir, M. (2022). Kualitas pelayanan aparatur sipil negara pada Kantor Kecamatan Panakkukang Kota Makassar [Service quality of civil servants at the Panakkukang Subdistrict Office, Makassar City]. Jurnal Ekobis: Ekonomi Bisnis & Manajemen, 12(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.37932/j.e.v12i2.601
- Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik [Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2009 on Public Services].
- Siregar, A. F., Siregar, N. S. S., & Lubis, M. S. (2022). Strategi peningkatan kinerja pelayanan publik bidang kepengurusan izin usaha dan izin mendirikan bangunan di Kantor Camat Lima Puluh Kabupaten Batu Bara [Strategies for improving public service performance in the administration of business licenses and building permits at the Lima Puluh Subdistrict Office, Batu Bara Regency]. PERSPEKTIF, 11(2), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v11i2.5853
- Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kualitatif [Qualitative research methods]. Alfabeta.
- Supriyanto. (2021). Analisis efektivitas pelatihan Pelayanan Administrasi Terpadu Kecamatan (PATEN) dalam meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan publik di kecamatan [Analysis of the effectiveness of Integrated Subdistrict Administrative Service (PATEN) training in improving the quality of public services at the subdistrict level]. Jurnal Widyaiswara Indonesia, 2(2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.56259/jwi.v2i2.74