Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): Agustus
Articles

EFFECTIVENESS AND DESIGN OF DIGITAL GAME-BASED LEARNING FOR SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

PDF
  • Rohmani
Rohmani
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Published 2026-08-13

Keywords

  • Digital Game-Based Learning,
  • Science Process Skills,
  • Higher Education,
  • Systematic Literature Review,
  • Instructional Design,
  • Serious Games
    • ...More
    Less

Abstract

Mastery of Science Process Skills (SPS) is a foundational competency in STEM higher education; however, conventional instructional methods consistently fail to facilitate deep engagement with complex and abstract scientific phenomena. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL) in developing undergraduate students’ science process skills, and to identify the instructional design elements most critical to achieving these outcomes. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 protocol. Empirical articles were retrieved from Scopus and ScienceDirect (2021–2025) and appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A final corpus of 33 articles was synthesised. DGBL produced consistently positive and significant effects on higher-order science process skills, with synthesised effect sizes of Hedges’ g ≈ 0.65–0.82 for problem-solving, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning. Effects on lower-order skills were more modest (g ≈ 0.38–0.45). Adaptive scaffolding, immediate formative feedback, and precise Learning Mechanics–Game Mechanics (LM–GM) alignment were identified as the most influential design variables. Stealth assessment frameworks provided more objective and process-oriented evaluations than conventional instruments. DGBL grounded in robust pedagogical design effectively bridges the gap between abstract scientific theory and authentic inquiry-based practice. Future research should prioritise Generative AI integration, immersive technologies, and longitudinal studies tracking long-term SPS retention.

PDF

References

  1. Barz, N., Benick, M., Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, L., & Perels, F. (2024). The effect of digital game-based learning interventions on cognitive, metacognitive, and affective-motivational learning outcomes in school: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 94(2), 193–227. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231167795
  2. Cai, Z., Mao, P., Wang, D., He, J., Chen, X., & Fan, X. (2022). Effects of scaffolding in digital game-based learning on student’s achievement: A three-level meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 537–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09655-0
  3. Cai, Z., Zhang, X., Liu, C., & Zhan, J. (2025). Effects of digital game-based learning on student’s problem-solving ability: A three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70002
  4. Caparoso, J. K. V., & Orleans, A. V. (2024). DiGIBST: An inquiry-based digital game-based learning pedagogical model for science teaching. STEM Education, 4(3), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024017
  5. Chen, C.-H., & Chen, C.-H. (2025). The timing of digital games in STEM instruction: Effects on learning outcomes, collaborative problem-solving, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and learning behavior. Research in Science and Technological Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2025.2561992
  6. Chen, C.-H., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2023). Adaptive scaffolding and engagement in digital game-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1785–1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10244-x
  7. Chen, S. Y., & Hsiao, T.-C. (2024). The effects of incorporating an electronic book into digital game-based learning: A prior knowledge perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(19), 6015–6026. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2247595
  8. Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582065
  9. Dever, D. A., Wiedbusch, M., Marano, C., Brosnihan, A., Smith, K., Patel, M., & Azevedo, R. (2024). From product to process data: Game mechanics for science learning. International Journal of Serious Games, 11(4), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v11i4.790
  10. Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.019
  11. Gong, Y.-l., Wang, M.-k., Tu, Y.-F., Huang, C.-q., & Zhang, D. (2026). Beyond pre-scripted interactions: Mapping the integration of LLMs in digital game-based learning: A scoping review. Entertainment Computing, 56, 101082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2026.101082
  12. Gui, Y., Cai, Z., Yang, Y., Kong, L., Fan, X., & Tai, R. H. (2023). Effectiveness of digital educational game and game design in STEM learning: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00424-9
  13. Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. McGill University.
  14. Hussein, M. H., Sulaiman, N. L., Noroozi, O., Elaish, M. M., & Alhasan, A. (2025). Value-added digital game-based learning in K-12 science education: A systematic literature review. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(5), 3282–3316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2450652
  15. Li, M.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 877–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9436-x
  16. Lin, Y.-L., Wang, W.-T., & Lai, Z.-L. (2025). Exploring students’ prior knowledge of and metacognitive skills for game-based learning in relation to cognitive strategy and learning effectiveness. Education and Information Technologies, 30(12), 17323–17360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13470-3
  17. Mitsea, E., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C. (2025). A systematic review of serious games in the era of artificial intelligence, immersive technologies, the Metaverse, and neurotechnologies: Transformation through meta-skills training. Electronics, 14(4), 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14040649
  18. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  19. Ramirez-Montoya, M. S., Patiño, A., & Hernandez, L. E. (2025). Formative assessment in DGBL: A qualitative analysis of players’ perceptions of game-based feedback in complex scenarios. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, Part F642, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5658-5_6
  20. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  21. Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
  22. Udeozor, C., Abegão, F. R., & Glassey, J. (2024). Measuring learning in digital games: Applying a game-based assessment framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 957–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13407
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  24. Wang, L.-H., Chen, B., Hwang, G.-J., Guan, J.-Q., & Wang, Y.-Q. (2022). Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students’ learning achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00344-0
  25. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7