Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Juni
Articles

ANALYSIS OF TEACHER WEAKNESSES IN PREPARING LEARNING OBJECTIVES IN THE LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR ELEMENTARY MADRASAH LEVEL

PDF
  • Siti Salwa Yusyifa,
  • Salamah
Siti Salwa Yusyifa
UIN Antasari Banjarmasin
Salamah
UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Published 2025-06-21

Keywords

  • Learning Objectives, Lesson Plans, MI Teachers

Abstract

Formulation of learning objectives is a crucial component in the Learning Implementation Plan (RPP), which determines the direction, process, and results of teaching and learning activities. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI) teachers in formulating learning objectives, especially in accordance with the ABCD model (Audience, Behavior, Condition, Degree). The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach with documentation techniques on a number of RPPs and informal interviews for data triangulation. The results of the study indicate that most teachers have not been able to formulate complete and measurable learning objectives. The Condition and Degree components are often ignored, so that the objectives become non-specific and difficult to evaluate. In addition, the dominance of memorization-based learning, limitations in methods and media, and inconsistencies between objectives, activities, and assessments strengthen the indication of weak instructional planning. The main factors causing this weakness are low understanding of the principles of formulating learning objectives, minimal professional training, and limited institutional support. These findings recommend the need for intensive training and ongoing mentoring for teachers to improve their competence in formulating effective learning objectives, in line with the principles of constructive alignment, and relevant to the 2013 Curriculum and the Independent Curriculum.

PDF

References

  1. Alzand, W. (2010). Instruction design and educational quality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4074–4081.
  2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
  3. Bariyah, L. (2014). Analisis Kesesuaian RPP Dan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Guru Smpn Di Kabupaten Mojokerto Pada Sub Materi Fotosintesis Dengan Kerikulum 2013. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 3(3).
  4. Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK).
  5. Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2019). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Routledge.
  6. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Hamm, M., & Adams, D. (2009). Activating assessment for all students. Rowman &
  7. Littlefield Publishers.
  8. Hidayat, H. (2015). Production based Learning: An Instructional Design Model in the context of vocational education and training (VET). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 206–211.
  9. Ibrahim, Z., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). Instructional design theory on teaching delivery and evaluation online for graphic design courses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 606–610.
  10. INDONESIA, M. P. D. A. N. K. R. (n.d.). PERATURAN MENTERI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 34 TAHUN 2018 2018 TENTANG STANDAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN SEKOLAH MENENGAH.
  11. Isman, A. (2011). Instructional design in education: new model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(1), 136–142.
  12. Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, 53(9), 1–11. Retrieved from
  13. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/sjdih/siperpu/dokumen/salinan/Permend ikbud Nomor 103 Tahun 2014
  14. Khuana, K., & Khuana, T. (2017). Impressive Learning Strategies With Indoctrinating Research-Based To Creative Thinking Skills For Educational Students. European Journal of Education Studies.
  15. Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2015). Teaching learning strategies. The role of instructional context and teacher beliefs. Journal for Educational Research Online, 7(1), 176–197.
  16. Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives.
  17. Moore, K. D. (2014). Effective instructional strategies: From theory to practice. Sage Publications.
  18. Mudlofir, A., & Rusydiyah, E. F. (2016). Desain Pembelajaaran Inovatif Dari Teori Ke Praktik Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  19. Nesari, A. J., & Heidari, M. (2014). The important role of lesson plan on educational achievement of Iranian EFL teachers’ attitudes. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 3(5), 25–31.
  20. Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33.
  21. Pitasari, M., & Febriyanti, B. D. (2023). Analisis kelengkapan dalam merumuskan tujuan pembelajaran pada mahasiswa PGMI semester V. Qalam: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 12(1), 35–42.
  22. Putri, D. R. (2021). Analisis Permasalahan Pembuatan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Tematik Kelas IV di SDS YKPP Lirik. Qalamuna-Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 13(2), 521–532.
  23. Sa’diyah, M., & Mujahidin, E. (2014). Upaya Membangun Budaya Akademik
  24. Guru Madrasah (Sebuah Langkah Awal). FIKRAH, 7(2).
  25. Sesiorina, S. (2014). The analysis of teachers’ lesson plan in implementing theme- based instruction for teaching English to young learners. Journal of English and Education, 2(1), 84–95.
  26. Setyawanto, A. (2012). Rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (RPP) guru bahasa Indonesia tingkat SMP di Kota Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang.
  27. Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning. Prentice Hall.
  28. Tung, K. Y. (2017). Desain Instruksional Perbandingan Model dan Implementasinya. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  29. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. van, & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Ten Steps to Complex Learning: a Systematic Approach to Instruction and Instructional Design. TechTrends, 62, 204–205.
  30. Yildiz, Z., & Karabiyik, B. (2012). The implementation of a lesson plan which is prepared according to the meaningful learning theory and evaluation of the results. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4021–4025.