Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Agustus
Articles

EDUCATION MANAGEMENT CONTEST AT NAHDLATUL ULAMA BANGILAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, PASURUAN CITY AND BINA INSAN CENDEKIA ISLAMIC SCHOOL, PASURUAN CITY IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF STUDENTS

PDF
  • Syahrul Firmansyah,
  • Dewi Masitah
Syahrul Firmansyah
STAI Al-Yasini Pasuruan
Dewi Masitah
STAI Al-Yasini Pasuruan

Published 2025-08-30

Keywords

  • Educational Management, Religious elementary school, Religious ideology (NU vs Tarbiyah)

Abstract

This study examines the contestation of educational management in two faith-based elementary schools in Pasuruan City: SD Unggulan Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) Bangilan and SDIT Bina Insan Cendekia. The research focuses on the management strategies applied and the ideological, structural, and cultural factors influencing their differences. Employing a qualitative approach with a multiple case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis. The findings reveal that SD NU Bangilan adopts a participatory-cultural management model emphasizing Ahlussunnah wal Jama’ah values, pesantren traditions, and community involvement. In contrast, SDIT Bina Insan Cendekia applies an integrated Islamic school management model that is systematic, disciplined, and indicator-based, supported by digital tools. The ideological orientation (NU vs tarbiyah), organizational structure, and school culture significantly shape distinct management patterns and influence student quality outcomes. In conclusion, the contestation between the two schools reflects not merely competition but also a constructive contribution of religious ideologies in fostering quality Islamic elementary education that is competitive and contextually relevant.

PDF

References

  1. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser, Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127–188). Monthly Review Press.
  2. Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487563
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
  4. Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management (C. Storrs, Trans.). Pitman. (Original work published 1916)
  5. Green, D., & Harvey, L. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
  6. Jalal, F., & Supriadi, D. (2001). Reformasi pendidikan dalam konteks otonomi daerah. Depdiknas.
  7. Khoiruddin, M. (2019). Efektivitas sistem manajemen sekolah Islam terpadu. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpi.v5i2.1234
  8. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Muttaqin, M. (2022). Pemikiran dan manajemen pendidikan NU dan Muhammadiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.19105/jpi.v10i1.5678
  10. Nur Rohman, M. (2024). Model manajemen pendidikan berbasis nilai-nilai Aswaja untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 45–60.
  11. Setiyawan, E. (2024). Implementasi manajemen pendidikan karakter dalam perspektif NU di SD NU Master Sokaraja Banyumas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 8(2), 101–115.
  12. Siagian, S. P. (2005). Filsafat administrasi. Bumi Aksara.
  13. Syamsul Arifin. (2015). Karakteristik partisipatif dalam manajemen sekolah NU. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 211–230.
  14. Terry, G. R. (2006). Principles of management (10th ed.). Irwin.
  15. Tilaar, H. A. R. (2002). Perubahan sosial dan pendidikan: Pengantar pedagogik transformatif untuk Indonesia. Grasindo.
  16. UNESCO. (2005). Education for all: The quality imperative (EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005). UNESCO Publishing.
  17. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.