Vol. 1 No. 5 (2025): Desember
Articles

ANTIHEROES AND THE DIALECTIC OF FREEDOM–‎ORDER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE THOUGHTS OF ‎EREN YEAGER, THANOS, AND THE TEMPLARS–‎ASSASSINS

PDF
  • Muhammad Hidayat,
  • Martin Kustati,
  • Bashori
Muhammad Hidayat
UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Martin Kustati
UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Bashori
UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Published 2025-12-13

Keywords

  • Antihero, freedom, political ideology, moral ambiguity‎

Abstract

This study explores the ideological dimensions of antiheroes in contemporary popular culture by conducting a comparative analysis of Eren Yeager, Thanos, and the Assassin–Templar conflict in Assassin’s Creed. Eren represents radical freedom driven by collective trauma and existential threat, often navigating moral ambiguity between liberation and destruction. Thanos embodies extreme utilitarian order, prioritizing systemic stability and the “greatest good” over individual moral agency, reflecting authoritarian and technocratic problem-solving logic. Meanwhile, the Assassin–Templar conflict presents a nuanced dialectic between liberty and control, with both factions justifying morally ambiguous actions to achieve societal balance. This research examines how these narratives articulate ethical dilemmas, ideological motivations, and the tension between freedom and order, demonstrating that modern antiheroes serve as critical lenses for evaluating complex political, social, and philosophical questions. The findings indicate that popular media provides a reflective space in which audiences negotiate morality, authority, and autonomy, highlighting the relevance of antiheroes in understanding contemporary ethical and ideological challenges.

PDF

References

  1. Abadía, A. A., & Rouvinski, V. (2025). Editorial: Exploring the global erosion of democracy: understanding multicausal threats and international dynamics. Frontiers in Political Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1694804
  2. Abbas, M. B. (2023). Balancing Hope and Fear: Muslim Modernists, Democracy, and the Tyranny of the Majority. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 65(3), 643–669. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417523000026
  3. Balakrishnan, A. (2020). Authoritarianism (Vols. 1–4, pp. 43–47). wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970843.ch184
  4. Balasubramaniam, R. R. (2022). Dislodging Malaysia’s Culture of Domination (pp. 245–257). World Scientific Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811268663_0017
  5. Barry Richards, B. (2024). Freedom Versus Belonging: A Core Ambivalence in Contemporary Political Dynamics (pp. 493–514). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30366-1_41
  6. Behnke, A., Armbruster, D., & Strobel, A. (2023). The needs of the many: Exploring associations of personality with third-party judgments of public health-related utilitarian rule violations. PLOS ONE, 18(4 April). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284558
  7. Cardenas, P., Obara, B., Theodoropoulos, G., & Kureshi, I. (2020). Unveiling Ideological Trends through Data Analytics to Construe National Security Instabilities (X. Wu, C. Jermaine, L. Xiong, X. T. Hu, O. Kotevska, S. Lu, W. Xu, S. Aluru, C. Zhai, E. Al-Masri, Z. Chen, & J. Saltz (eds.); pp. 4308–4317). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378020
  8. Celik, N. (2025). Local Governments in a Competitive Authoritarian Regime: Opposition-Run Metropolitan Municipalities in Turkey. Middle East Journal, 78(2–3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.3751/78.23.16
  9. Collord, M., & Nyamsenda, S. (2025). ‘This country is free, but for the few’: Informal labour, class politics, and urban order in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. World Development, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107027
  10. Dicke-Bohmann, A. K., Turner, C. S., & Cox, C. B. (2024). The Nature of the Political Animal: Development of the Triplex Scale of Political Orientation. North American Journal of Psychology, 26(4), 849–876. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85211628256&partnerID=40&md5=918dec6911f754d04e8af71150933dc2
  11. Easler, J. S., & Samons, K. M. (2024). Geralt the huntsman: The witcher’s upending of the classic “hero” trope (pp. 87–98). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-788-420241008
  12. Freire-Sánchez, A., & Lopera-Mármol, M. (2025). Deconstruction of the superhero subgenre in The Boys: A social satire through characters with mental disorders. Critical Studies in Television. https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020251360014
  13. Furnham, A. (2025). The Dark Side of Conventionalism: Dark-side Personality Traits and the Values of Security and Tradition. Journal of Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/09716858251358451
  14. Gershman, C. (2020). The instinct for freedom. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0008
  15. Gopalan, G. (2019). The Shortage of Malaysian Stem Cell Ethics in Mainstream Database: a Preliminary Study. Asian Bioethics Review, 11(4), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-019-00102-5
  16. Grimm, S., Weiffen, B., & Mross, K. (2025). Democracy promotion in times of autocratization: a conceptual note. Democratization, 32(7), 1617–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2543778
  17. Grizzard, M., Huang, J., Ahn, C., Fitzgerald, K., Francemone, C. J., & Walton, J. (2020). The Gordian Knot of Disposition Theory: Character Morality and Liking. Journal of Media Psychology, 32(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000257
  18. Gugushvili, D., & Meuleman, B. (2025). Eco-social divides in public policy preferences in Great Britain. British Journal of Sociology, 76(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13172
  19. Hadarics, M., & Krekó, P. (2025). Nothing to see here, move along! Illiberal contexts as catalyzers of authoritarian misperception of democratic quality. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70016
  20. Hamersma, E. (2025). Reformulating Digital Leninism: a response to Sebastian Heilmann’s notions on digital governance in China. AI and Society, 40(8), 6357–6364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02412-9
  21. Harris, K. M. A. (2022). SECULARISATION OF ETHICS AND CONTEMPORARY MORAL CRISIS. Afkar, 23(2), 121–170. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol23no2.4
  22. Hollis-Brusky, A. (2024). Making Fusionism Great Again: Authoritarian Means to Christian Nationalist Ends. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 713(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251324087
  23. Hsu, H.-Y., Wang, T., & Feng, X.-Y. (2025). Revisiting the “Lethal Union”: The Role of RWA and SDO in the Chinese Public’s Reactions to the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 60(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70125
  24. Jiang, A., Vitsakis, N., Dinkar, T., Abercrombie, G., & Konstas, I. (2024). Re-examining Sexism and Misogyny Classification with Annotator Attitudes (Y. Al-Onaizan, M. Bansal, & Y.-N. Chen (eds.); pp. 15103–15125). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.887
  25. Johnson, J., Sattler, D. N., Luo, S., van Hiel, A., Dierckx, K., Vezzali, L., & Lawley, K. A. (2025). Reactions to Violent Extremist Groups: Militia Race Determines Whether Low and High Authoritarians Have “Selective Contextual Blindness” to Critical Information That Diminishes Punishment. Psychology of Violence, 15(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000590
  26. Kerr, B. A. (2025). The Psychology of Liberty: Reclaiming Everyday Freedom. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84670-0
  27. Koepsell, D. (2024). Breaking Bad as Philosophy: The Moral Aesthetics of the Anti-hero’s Journey (pp. 163–183). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24685-2_20
  28. Maksimova, O. V, & Aronov, I. Z. (2024). Achieving Consensus in Groups with Low Authoritarianism of Participants in Decision Making. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 9(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2024.9.1.004
  29. McKay, I. (2021). Epic heroes and excessive emotions: Démesure in the song of Roland and Raoul of Cambrai. Comitatus, 52(52), 59–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2021.0002
  30. Mojab, S., & Ganjavi, M. (2025). Students Revolt, State Revenge: Universities and Authoritarianism in Iran (pp. 125–139). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003442264-11
  31. Mojtahedi, D., Stevens, K. L., & Austin, A. (2024). Right-wing ideology fuels bias against sex trafficking victims: the mediating role of sexism. Psychology, Crime and Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2386557
  32. Rao, N. (2021). Authoritarianism and making of counterdiscourse in colonial Goa. Revista de Historia Das Ideias, 39, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-8925_39_3
  33. Sheikh, M. Z. H., & Ahmed, Z. S. (2020). Military, Authoritarianism and Islam: A Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh and Pakistan. Politics and Religion, 13(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048319000440
  34. Thapa, B. R., Boggess, J., & Bae, J. (2025). A large electroencephalogram database of freewill reaching and grasping tasks for brain machine interfaces. Scientific Data, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06039-9
  35. Turner, B. S. (2008). The crisis of religious authority: Education, information and technology (pp. 53–70). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933404-10
  36. Uroko, F. C., Nnadi, S. N., & Okoli, A. B. (2025). The strategic use of ethnic and religious identity in Nigerian elections by the two dominant political parties. African Identities, 23(3), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2024.2383670
  37. Veit, S., Hirsch, M., Giebler, H., Gründl, J., & Schürmann, B. (2025). Submission or Rebellion? Disentangling the Relationships of Anxiety, Attitudes Toward Authorities, and Right-Wing Populist Party Support. American Behavioral Scientist, 69(14 Special Issue: The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test), 1775–1797. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241240717
  38. Wagoner, J. A., & Yakob, Y. (2025). Partisan identity, ideological orientations, and the differential criticisms of ingroup and outgroup leadership: An examination of the 2024 U.S. election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70033
  39. Wennekes, E. (2023). Harassing Hogwash Scored with Happy Hardcore: The Ruthless Humor of the Dutch New Kids Films (pp. 397–413). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33422-1_23
  40. Zakaras, A. (2025). FREEDOM FOR ALL: WHAT A LIBERAL SOCIETY COULD BE. Yale University Press. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105021780623&partnerID=40&md5=024f92391cf0f791ee755d6d6d665888
  41. Zheng, Q., & Li, M. (2023). Foreign Movies and TV Dramas as the Source of Political Argot in an Authoritarian Context: Memes and Creative Resistance in Chinese Social Media. Critical Arts, 37(6), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2024.2317453
  42. Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. Harcourt.
  43. Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430–1453.
  44. Baumeister, R. F., et al. (2011). Free will in consumer behavior: Self-control, ego depletion, and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 414–425.
  45. Berlin, I. (1969). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford University Press.
  46. Camus, A. (1955). The Myth of Sisyphus. Penguin.
  47. Canetti, D., et al. (2010). Exposure to political violence and aggressive political orientations. British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 919–939.
  48. Vollhardt, J. R. (2020). Collective victimhood. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 15–19.
  49. Waytz, A., & Eidelman, S. (2020). The moralization of violence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 27–3
  50. Isayama, H. (2013). Attack on Titan. Kodansha.
  51. Marvel Studios. (2018). Avengers: Infinity War.
  52. Ubisoft. (2007–2023). Assassin’s Creed series.