HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL LEGAL RIGHTS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF SHARIA AN CUSTOMARY LAW IN INDONESIA
Published 2025-12-27
Keywords
- Shari'ah,
- Fiqih,
- Fositive Law,
- Maqasid al-Shari'ah,
- Legal Pluralism
- Legal Harmonization ...More
Abstract
Indonesian law is the result of interaction among three major legal systems, namely customary law, Islamic law, and positive law. Within this context of legal pluralism, there is an ongoing need to harmonize Islamic normative values with the national legal system in order to develop a legal order that is both religious in character and responsive to modern demands. This study aims to analyze the conceptual and practical relationship between sharī‘ah, fiqh, and positive law within the framework of legal pluralism, as well as to assess the extent to which Islamic values can be substantively integrated into the Indonesian national legal system. This research employs a normative legal method using conceptual, comparative, and Islamic law approaches. The study relies on secondary data sources, including scholarly literature, statutory regulations, and relevant legal documents. The findings indicate that the integration of Islamic normative values into national law has been realized through several legislative instruments, such as the Law on Hajj and Umrah Administration, the Marriage Law, the Zakat Law, and the Halal Product Assurance Law. These legal frameworks reflect a dynamic synergy between the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and the doctrine of ius constitutum in shaping laws that promote justice and public welfare (maṣlaḥah). However, this harmonization process continues to face significant challenges, particularly in the form of inconsistencies in legal politics and the tendency toward the formalization of sharī‘ah norms. This study argues that a substantive approach—through the internalization of Islamic ethical values within legal policies—is more ideal than a formalistic approach. Such an approach is essential to realizing a national legal system that is pluralistic, humanistic, and aligned with the universal spirit of raḥmatan lil ‘ālamīn.
References
- Dewata, Mukti Fajar Nur, dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2022.
- Hadjar, Ibnu. “Syari’at Islam Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” Al-Mawarid: Jurnal Hukum Islam 16 (2006). https://journal.uii.ac.id/JHI/article/view/239.
- Kasmad, Ratni. “Peluang Dan Tantangan Integrasi Nilai-Nilai Hukum Islam Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law 2, no. 2 (Desember 2021): 26–37. https://doi.org/10.24256/maddika.v1i1.1714.
- Mansyur, Zaenuddin, dan Moh. Asyiq Amrulloh. Ushul Fiqh Dasar. Mataram: Sanabil, 2020.
- Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2022.
- Menski, Werner. Comparative Law in a Global Contex: The Legal System of Asia and Afrika. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
- Mochtar, Zainal Arifin, dan Eddy O.S. Hiariej. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2021.
- Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
- Nurhayati, Nurhayati. “Memahami Konsep Syariah, Fikih, Hukum Dan Ushul Fikih.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 2, no. 2 (Desember 2018): 124–34. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-hes.v2i2.1620.
- Rahmatunnair. “Paradigma Formalisasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 12, no. 1 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v12i1.984.
- Ramli. Ushul Fiqh. Yogyakarta: Nuta Media, 2021.
- Sumardi, Dedy. “Islam, Pluralisme Hukum dan Refleksi Masyarakat Homogen.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 50, no. 2 (Desember 2016): 481–504. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v50i2.240.
- Taufiq, M. “Konsep dan Sumber Hukum: Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Islam dan Sistem Hukum Positif.” Jurnal Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (2021).
- Warjiyati, Sri. Memahami Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Konsep Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018.
- Yudha, Alda Kartika. “Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif: Perbedaan, Hubungan, Dan Pandangan Ulama.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 8, no. 2 (Agustus 2017): 157–72. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v8i2.a7019.