Vol. 1 No. 5 (2025): Desember
Articles

COLLABORATION-BASED PUBLIC SERVICES: THE ROLE OF THE SURABAYA CITY CIVIL SERVICE POLICE UNIT AND LOCAL STAKESHOLDERS IN SUKOLILO DISTRICT

PDF
  • Dimas Arif Fitriansyah ,
  • Sri Roekminiati,
  • Ika Devy pramudiana,
  • Sapto Pramono
Dimas Arif Fitriansyah
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Sri Roekminiati
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Ika Devy pramudiana
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Sapto Pramono
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

Published 2025-12-29

Keywords

  • Collaboration, Municipal Police, Public Service, Local Governance

Abstract

This research examines cooperative public service practices involving the Municipal Police (Satpol PP) of Surabaya City and local stakeholders in the Sukolilo District, emphasizing the mapping of the collaboration network, evaluating coordination mechanisms, and identifying challenges and effective strategies that can enhance the execution of local policies. Employing a descriptive qualitative method, data were gathered via in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and document analysis, then analyzed through thematic analysis to uncover interaction patterns, role allocation, and collaborative governance dynamics at the community level. The results indicate that the collaboration network includes governmental bodies, community leaders, local units, business representatives, and security organizations, though the level of interaction and frequency differ by region. Coordination mechanisms function via official platforms and online communication channels; however, issues remain, such as overlapping authorities, uneven information distribution, and restricted human resources. Notwithstanding these challenges, a number of best practices arise, including the utilization of digital communication tools for swift responses, engagement of community leaders in resolving conflicts, and the implementation of collaborative enforcement strategies. The research highlights the necessity to bolster collaborative governance frameworks, improve cross-sectoral capacity development, and standardize coordination methods to enhance the efficiency of public service delivery. This study enhances collaborative governance frameworks in urban settings and provides policy suggestions to strengthen partnership-driven public services.

PDF

References

  1. Agranoff, R. C. N.-J. . A. 2017. (2017). Crossing boundaries for intergovernmental management. In Public management and change series.
  2. Ahmad, Z., Esposito, P., Ahmad, Z., & Esposito, P. (2025). Collaborative Governance for Social Change and Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study of Campania Region. Administrative Sciences 2025, Vol. 15, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ADMSCI15060217
  3. Amirullah, I. (2024). Analyzing the Impact of Collaborative Governance Models on Public Service Delivery. Digital Innovation : International Journal of Management, 1(3), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.61132/DIGITALINNOVATION.V1I3.20
  4. Ananda, M. A., & Handayani, W. (2024). Peran Penting Satpol PP dalam Menegakkan Ketertiban Umum Kota Surabaya. Bumi : Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Sosialisasi Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(3), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.61132/BUMI.V2I3.231
  5. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUM032
  6. Dewi, N. L. Y. (2019). Dinamika Collaborative Governance Dalam Studi Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 3(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.38043/JIDS.V3I2.2188
  7. Edri-Peer, O., & Cohen, N. (2025). Revisiting coping mechanisms on the street-level: a systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 35(4), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUAF022
  8. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUR011
  9. Ertz, M. (2024). Co-Creation. Encyclopedia, 4(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ENCYCLOPEDIA4010012
  10. Fiantika, F. R. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Y. Novita, Ed.; 1st ed., Issue April). PT GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI.
  11. Fitriadi, A. D. D., Isabella, I., & Putra, D. A. (2025). Inovasi Sistem Pelayanan Antar Dokumen Umum Ke Rumah Warga (Si Paduka). Studi Ilmu Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 6(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.35912/SIMO.V6I1.3582
  12. Gofen, A., Rønning, R., & Sønderskov, M. (2025). Street-level bureaucracy and Co-creation: towards theory synthesis and cross-fertilization. Public Management Review, 27(8), 1912–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2429013;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI
  13. Grindell, C., Coates, E., Croot, L., & O’Cathain, A. (2022). The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 877. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-022-08079-Y
  14. Hegele, Y. (2018). Explaining bureaucratic power in intergovernmental relations: A network approach. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12537
  15. Irwansyah, I. (2021). Adhocracy as a Model for Organizing Government Institution in Simplifying Indonesian Bureaucracy. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.24258/JBA.V17I2.832
  16. Mahardhani, A. J. (2018). Advokasi Kebijakan Publik. CALINA MEDIA. http://unicat.umpo.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=21148&keywords=
  17. Mahardhani, A. J. (2023). Pemerintahan Kolaboratif (Menjawab Tantangan Masa Depan). Literasi Nusantara. https://penerbitlitnus.co.id/portfolio/pemerintahan-kolaboratif-menjawab-tantangan-masa-depan/
  18. Mahardhani, A. J., Sulton, S., & Sunarto, S. (2020). Peran Civil Society (CSO) dalam Perumusan Kebijakan Publik (Kajian di Kabupaten Ponorogo). JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 4(2), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.26740/JPSI.V4N2.P59-62
  19. Noor, M., Suaedi, F., & Mardiyanta, A. (2022). Collaborative Governance: Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis dan Praktik. Bildung.
  20. Northcott, E. W. (2025). Automating street-level discretion: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/PSJ.70024;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER
  21. Pahleviannur, M. R., Grave, A. D., Saputra, D. N., Mardianto, D., & Mahardhani, A. J. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Pradina Pustaka.
  22. Park, A. Y. S., Krause, R. M., & Hawkins, C. V. (2021). Institutional Mechanisms for Local Sustainability Collaboration: Assessing the Duality of Formal and Informal Mechanisms in Promoting Collaborative Processes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUAA036
  23. Qindi, A. E. Al. (2024). Implementasi Wewenang Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja (Sapol PP) Dalam Penegakan Peraturan Daerah di Kota Surabaya. JISP (Jurnal Inovasi Sektor Publik), 4(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.38156/JISP.V4I1.230
  24. Sørensen, E., Hendriks, C. M., Hertting, N., & Edelenbos, J. (2020). Political boundary spanning: politicians at the interface between collaborative governance and representative democracy. Policy and Society, 39(4), 530–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1743526;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:RPAS19;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
  25. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2016). Theories of democratic network governance. In Theories of Democratic Network Governance. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625006
  26. Suhendi, D. (2019). Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja sebagai Pelindung Masyarakat. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Keamanan Publik (JP Dan KP), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.33701/JPKP.V1I2.716
  27. Uster, A., Beeri, I., & Vashdi, D. (2025). Effective co-production in local government networks: A story of structure. International Public Management Journal, 28(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2024.2337786
  28. Valentino, R., Hartanto, C. A., Albenda, J. G., Alviandy, P., Wulandari, A. L., & Murdhani, L. A. (2022). Inovasi Pelayanan Melalui Aplikasi Layanan Pengaduan Masyarakat Interaktif Terpadu (Lapsit) Terhadap Penanganan Gangguan Ketertiban dan Keamanan Masyarakat di Satpol PP Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(4), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.31004/JPDK.V4I4.5286
  29. Van den Oord, S., Kenis, P., Raab, J., & Cambré, B. (2023). Modes of network governance revisited: Assessing their prevalence, promises, and limitations in the literature. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1564–1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/PUAR.13736;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER
  30. Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., de Jong, J., & Keijser, B. (2020). Paradoxes of collaborative governance: investigating the real-life dynamics of multi-agency collaborations using a quasi-experimental action-research approach. Public Management Review, 22(3), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1599056