Vol. 1 No. 5 (2025): Desember
Articles

THE NEXUS BETWEEN ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE: EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA

PDF
  • Muhammad Khafid Ainul Yaqin,
  • Yaen Miftakhul Laily,
  • Ni Wayan Desi Budha Jayanti
Muhammad Khafid Ainul Yaqin
Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan
Yaen Miftakhul Laily
Universitas Jember
Ni Wayan Desi Budha Jayanti
Universitas Negeri Manado

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • Democratic Governance,
  • Electoral System,
  • Indonesia,
  • Political Participation,
  • Election Quality

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between electoral systems and democratic governance in Indonesia by analyzing the implementation of democratic principles in Indonesian elections. Using a literature review methodology, this research evaluates Indonesia's electoral system against four key elements of democratic elections: competitiveness, periodicity, inclusiveness, and definitiveness. The findings reveal that while Indonesia has established strong legal frameworks and institutional mechanisms for democratic elections, challenges remain in translating campaign intensity into meaningful voter engagement. The study demonstrates that Indonesia has successfully implemented periodic leadership transitions, maintains inclusive electoral processes through comprehensive legislation, and enables citizens to exercise informed electoral choices. However, low voter participation and limited impact of candidate programs on voter preferences indicate areas requiring improvement. This research contributes to understanding democratic governance in emerging democracies and provides practical recommendations for electoral system enhancement.

PDF

References

  1. Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Southeast Asia’s Troubling Elections: Nondemocratic Pluralism in Indonesia. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 104–118.
  2. Chandra, M. J. A., Anggono, B. D., & Febrian, F. (2025). Reforming Indonesia’s Electoral System: Legal and Policy Considerations. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 14(1), 23–45.
  3. Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. (1945).
  4. Cooper, H. M. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Sage Publications.
  5. Hanan, D. (2014). Making Presidentialism Work: Legislative and Executive Interaction in Indonesian Democracy. Ohio State University.
  6. Indonesia, P. (2022). Survei Nasional Kandidat Kuat Kandidasi Pilpres 2024. Depok: Poltracking Indonesia.
  7. Klein, A. (2011). Concepts and Principles of Democratic Governance and Accountability. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 52.
  8. Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036.
  9. Mietzner, M. (2023). Presidential coalition-management strategies and their effects on democracy. Government and Opposition, 58(4), 789–812.
  10. Pepinsky, T. B. (2025). Cleavages, Institutions, and Democracy in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 44(1), 15–42.
  11. Perludem, K. V. (2020). Pemilu dalam Sejarah Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/12/pemilu-dalam-sejarah
  12. Powell, G. B. (2013). Electoral Responsiveness, Party Government, and the Imperfect Performance of Democratic Elections.
  13. Rahmatunnisa, M., & Bainus, A. (2025). Voting behavior in Asian democracies. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 38(2), 145–162.
  14. Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., & Ellis, A. (2008). Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA.
  15. Sukmajati, M., & Aspinall, E. (2023). Institutionalization and party resilience in Indonesian electoral democracy. Heliyon, 9(12).
  16. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2019). Indeks Demokrasi 2019. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
  17. Tshishonga, N. S. (2025). Municipal election systems and their implications for ethical and accountable democratic governance at eThekwini Municipality. Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation, 6.
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. (2017).