SACRED LANDSCAPES AND URBAN EXPANSION: THE ROLE OF PAPUAN COSMOLOGY IN CITY PLANNING AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT
Published 2026-02-28
Keywords
- Papuan cosmology, Sacred landscapes, Urban planning, Spatial development, Indigenous knowledge
Abstract
This article examines the intersection of Papuan cosmological belief systems and contemporary urban planning practices in the provinces of Papua and West Papua, Indonesia. Indigenous Papuan communities maintain deep ontological relationships between sacred landscapes including mountains, rivers, forests, and ancestral sites and their social and spiritual ordering of space. As rapid urbanisation accelerates across the Bird’s Head Peninsula, the Mamberamo Basin, and the Jayapura metropolitan corridor, development frameworks frequently disregard these cosmological mappings, generating socio-cultural displacement and environmental degradation. Drawing on ethnogeographic fieldwork, spatial analysis, and a review of regional planning documents (RTRW), this study argues that integrating Papuan cosmological knowledge into city planning and spatial development policies can enhance cultural sustainability, reduce land conflict, and foster more equitable urban futures. The article advances a framework for cosmologically informed planning, proposing policy mechanisms, community consultation protocols, and spatial mapping methodologies adapted to diverse Papuan ethno-cultural contexts.
References
- Braithwaite, J., Braithwaite, V., Cookson, M., & Dunn, L. (2010). Anomie and violence: Non-truth and reconciliation in Indonesian peacebuilding. ANU Press.
- BPS Papua. (2022). Provinsi Papua dalam angka 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua.
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Colchester, M., & Chao, S. (Eds.). (2013). Conflict or consent? Forest Peoples Programme.
- Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture (J. Lloyd, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
- Franky, Y., & Sari, I. (2018). Konflik agraria di tanah Papua: Dokumentasi kasus 2013–2017. PUSAKA Bentara Rakyat.
- Giay, B., & Ballard, C. (2003). Defining the Papuan. In C. Ballard et al. (Eds.), The sweet potato in Oceania (pp. 11–24). Ethnology Monographs.
- Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447.
- Hidayati, D. (2020). Pemetaan wilayah adat dalam rencana tata ruang wilayah: Tantangan dan peluang di Papua. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 31(2), 112–130.
- Howitt, R., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2006). Rethinking the building blocks: Ontological pluralism and the idea of ‘management’. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(3), 323–335.
- Kirsch, S. (2006). Reverse anthropology: Indigenous analysis of social and environmental relations in New Guinea. Stanford University Press.
- Mansoben, J. R. (1995). Sistem politik tradisional di Irian Jaya: Studi perbandingan. LIPI dan RUL.
- Robbins, J., & Wardlow, H. (Eds.). (2005). The making of global and local modernities in Melanesia. Ashgate.
- Rumansara, E. H. (2019). Koreri dan konstruksi kosmologi Biak-Numfor dalam relasi manusia dan alam. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 21(1), 1–18.
- Sumule, A. (2020). Special autonomy for Papua: What went wrong and what can be done? In E. Aspinall & M. Mietzner (Eds.), Problems of democratisation in Indonesia (pp. 261–285). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
- Timmer, J. (2000). The return of the kingdom: Patterns of millennialism in the Bomberai Peninsula of Iran Jaya. Oceania, 71(1), 42–57.
- Tipa, G., & Tierney, L. (2006). A cultural health index for streams and waterways. Ministry for the Environment New Zealand.
- Trigger, D., & Dalley, C. (2010). Negotiating indigeneity: Culture, identity, and politics. Reviews in Anthropology, 39(1), 46–65.
- Wainggai, T. V. (2021). Dinamika kependudukan dan implikasinya terhadap perencanaan kota di Papua. Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 12(1), 45–62.