Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): April
Articles

THE ROLE OF THE SENTANI CUSTOMARY COUNCIL IN POLICY COMMUNICATION AND AGENDA SETTING IN HANDLING CUSTOMARY LAND CONFLICTS IN JAYAPURA REGENCY

PDF
  • Yudith N.A. Karetji,
  • Henderina Morin,
  • Abner Herry Bajari,
  • Ibrahim Kristofol Kendi
Yudith N.A. Karetji
Universitas Cenderawasih
Henderina Morin
Universitas Cenderawasih
Abner Herry Bajari
Universitas Cenderawasih
Ibrahim Kristofol Kendi
Universitas Cenderawasih

Published 2026-04-01

Keywords

  • Sentani Customary Council, policy communication, agenda setting, customary rights, Papua.

Abstract

This study examines the role  of the Sentani Customary Council (DAS) in influencing the public policy agenda in Jayapura Regency through the perspective  of policy communication. Indigenous peoples have a strategic position as guardians of traditional values as well as political actors guaranteed by the constitution,  the Papua Special Autonomy Law, and Permendagri No. 52 of 2014.Based on Dunn's (2017) public policy theory, the policy process is interactive, involving communication, interests, and power. This research is also based on agenda setting theory (McCombs & Shaw, 1972; Cobb & Elder, 1971) as well as  the Multiple Streams model (Kingdon, 2003), which describes how public issues enter the government's agenda through communication and political support.This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collection through interviews, observations, and documentation studies, which are then analyzed using the analysis model of Miles and Huberman (2014). The results show that watersheds play an important role in framing the issue of land encroachment as a symbol of customary rights through horizontal communication in the community, vertically with the government, and through mass media and social media. This strategy makes cultural issues the government's attention, showing the dynamics of policy networks (Rhodes, 1997) between customary institutions, bureaucracies, NGOs, and civil society. The research concludes that culture-based communication is effective in transforming local issues into politically recognized public policies. Going forward, there is a need for formal recognition of the role of Indigenous Councils, communication capacity building, and collaboration with the media and academics to strengthen local values-based policy governance and indigenous peoples' participation.

PDF

References

  1. Asmare Shetahun Alemneh. (2023). The role of the indigenous conflict resolution mechanism in land-use dispute resolution in Bahir Dar Zuria Woreda. Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4). Science Publishing Group.
  2. Boelens, R., Perreault, T., & Vos, J. (2016). Water justice. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Buanes, A., Jentoft, S., & Karlsen, G. (2015). Legitimacy and indigenous governance in Norway. Journal of Arctic Studies, 47(2), 221-239.
  4. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  5. Cornell, S., & Kalt, J. P. (2000). Reloading the dice: Improving the chances for economic development on American Indian reservations. Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development.
  6. Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. Yale University Press.
  7. Darman, A. A. E. (2025). The role of customary institutions in supporting local governance in West Sumatra. Symbolic Journal: STISIP Imam Bonjol, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.55850/simbol.v4i2.
  8. Dunn, W. N. (2017). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach. Routledge.
  9. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley.
  10. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
  11. Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press.
  12. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.
  13. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
  14. Irawati, D. (2006). The Socio-Political Existence of the Papuan Customary Council. Indonesian Christian University.
  15. Kambuaya, Y. (2020). The role of customary institutions in mediating agrarian conflicts in Papua. Journal of Papuan Government Sciences, 5(2), 112-125.
  16. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
  17. Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman.
  18. Lasswell, H. D. (1958). Politics: Who gets what, when, and how. World Publishing.
  19. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy networks in the British government. Oxford University Press.
  20. McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  21. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
  22. McDonald, C., & Figueiredo, L. (2022). A framework for comparative assessment of indigenous land governance. Land, 11(6), 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060906.
  23. Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship. Policy Studies Journal, 32(2), 55-75.
  24. Papua.go.id. (2005). The Customary Council does not take care of politics.
  25. Papua.go.id. (2023). The Papuan Customary Council urges the executive and legislature to restore Special Autonomy.
  26. Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
  27. Papua Provincial Regulation Number 5 of 2022 concerning the Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities.
  28. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy networks. Sage.
  29. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press
  30. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2017). Network governance and the differentiated polity.
  31. Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). Policy networks in the British government. Oxford University Press.
  32. Scott, A. (2022). Implementation of the indigenous peoples' recognition policy in Papua. Journal of Special Autonomy of Papua, 4(1), 34-47.
  33. Rumbiak, E. (2018). The existence of customary institutions in the structure of local government. Journal of Law and Indigenous Peoples, 3(1), 45-56.
  34. Rumbay, M. C. Y. (2022). Collaborative governance between local governments and Customary Councils in Papua. Thesis, Cenderawasih University.
  35. Rupiassa, D. A. (2018). Institutional Council of Customary and Spatial Politics in Kaimana Regency. Journal of Political Review (8(1)), 1-28. DOI: 10.15642/jrp.2018.8.1.1-13.
  36. Sanggenafa, C. O. I., & Hidayana, I. M. (2020). The role of the Sentani Tribe Customary Council in resolving domestic violence conflicts. Cenderawasih: Journal of Papuan Anthropology, 1(1), 8-20.
  37. Smith, L. T. (2019). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
  38. Sunarno. (2019). Development of land conflict settlement model based on indigenous knowledge of the local communities in Indonesia. Indonesian Comparative Law Review. University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
  39. Sukirno, & Wibawa, K. C. S. (2022). Indigenous land dispute resolution in Indonesia: Exploring customary courts as an alternative to formal judicial processes. Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution.
  40. Suwardi, S., & Rustan, R. (2022). Settlement of disputes over indigenous land ownership based on traditional law. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(3).
  41. Turner, D. (2016). Indigenous policy streams in Canada: Negotiating rights and recognition. Canadian Public Administration Journal, 59(3), 345-370.
  42. "Indigenous land rights: Towards respect and implementation." (2017). House of Commons of Canada.
  43. Understanding legal frameworks for indigenous land management and rights. (n.d.). WritWise. My Blog. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351103032_Analysis_Of_The_Legal_Frameworks_Of_Indigenous_People%27s_Rights_Over_Their_Natural_Resources_And_The_Impacts_of_Extractive_Industries
  44. Yoman, B. (2019). Land and identity: Agrarian conflict in the Land of Papua. Cenderawasih Press. https://tifafoundation.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Pembangunan-Marginalisasi-dan-Disintegrasi-Papua.pdf