All submitted manuscripts undergo an editorial screening followed by a double-blind peer review process. The journal editor does not disclose the reviewers’ identities to the authors, nor the authors’ identities to the reviewers. Thus, both parties remain anonymous. All identifying information such as names, affiliations, and similar details is removed.

Submitted manuscripts are typically reviewed by two to three experts who are asked to assess whether the manuscript is scientifically sound, coherent, non-duplicative of previously published work, and sufficiently clear for publication. Reviewers are also asked to evaluate the level of interest and significance of the research. The Editors will make a decision based on these reports and, when necessary, consult members of the Editorial Board.

Based on the reviewers’ comments, the editors will decide to accept or reject the manuscript under the following conditions:

1. Accept for publication, with or without editorial revisions.
2. Invite the authors to revise their manuscript and address specific concerns.
3. Reject the manuscript, typically due to lack of originality, insufficient conceptual contribution, or major technical and/or interpretational issues.

Any changes made to the original manuscript will be clearly communicated for the authors’ review.

Authors are expected to carefully check the sentence structure, completeness and accuracy of the text, references, tables, and graphic elements in the revised manuscript. The Editor-in-Chief holds the final authority regarding the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts. The Editorial Board reserves the right to edit articles for style, format, and clarity. Manuscripts containing excessive errors such as spelling or punctuation will be returned to the authors for revision before resubmission or may be rejected entirely.